Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter discusses one of the most challenging aspects of silicon photonics, namely the laser. It is highly desirable to have a silicon-compatible material that can provide optical emission and optical gain, for light sources (lasers, LEDs) and for on-chip optical amplifiers. Silicon is an indirect-band semiconductor, hence very inefficient at light generation. The common semiconductors used to make lasers at wavelengths where silicon is transparent (> 1.1 µm), such as In P-based compounds, have a crystal-lattice constant that is much larger than silicon, hence are difficult to grow on silicon. Germanium is the closest-matched material and has a smaller band gap than silicon; however, it is also an indirect-band semiconductor. Present-day multi-project wafer (MPW) foundries (see Section 1.5.5) do not provide monolithic or hybrid-integrated lasers, and users rely on external lasers. While edge and grating couplers have both seen improvements in coupling efficiency, the lack of an on-chip source limits the potential applications of these chips. Laser integration is not widely available, and in turn the design of lasers for silicon photonics is an evolving research area. While there are design methodologies for the various laser-integration approaches described below, these depend on the type of approach, hence silicon photonic laser design is not a typical “text-book” topic. This chapter describes the challenges associated with integrating lasers and optical amplifiers on the silicon photonics platform. It begins with the easiest method of getting light on the chip – namely using external lasers. We then discuss approaches with increasing level of difficulty: co-packaging, epitaxial bonding (hybrid lasers), monolithic growth, and germanium lasers. External lasers One approach for silicon photonic systems is to consider the laser as an optical power supply [1], similar to electrical power supplies, both delivering a constant amplitude. There are several advantages for keeping the laser off-chip. (1) Thermal management is simplified by keeping the laser off-chip. Lasers are typically 10%–30% efficient, hence an on-chip laser would be a contributing heat source; the heat output is 3–10 times higher than the optical power of the laser itself. […]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.121 | 0.072 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".