MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232421506 · doi:10.1093/ibd/izaa347.023

MACHINE LEARNING FOR CROHN’S DISEASE PHENOTYPE MODELING USING BIOPSY IMAGES

2021· article· en· W4232421506 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sana Syed, Saurav S. Sengupta, Lubaina Ehsan, Erin Bonkowski, Christopher A. Moskaluk, Anne M. Griffiths, Anthony Otley, Ashish Patel, Barbara S. Kirschner, David R. Mack, David Ziring, Dedrick E. Moulton, James Markowitz, Jason S. Shapiro, Jeffrey S. Hyams, Jennifer L. Dotson, Joel R. Rosh, Joshua D. Noe, Maria Oliva‐Hemker, Marian Pfefferkorn, Melvin B. Heyman, Ajay Gulati, Richárd Kellermayer, Robert N. Baldassano, Sandra Kim, Scott B. Snapper, Shervin Rabizadeh, Stanley Cohen, Stephen L. Guthery, Subra Kugathasan, Susan Baker, Tom Walters, Lee A. Denson

Bibliographic record

VenueInflammatory Bowel Diseases · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhenotypeBiopsyArtificial intelligenceMedicineH&E stainPathologyRadiologyComputer scienceMachine learningImmunohistochemistryGeneBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Predicting Crohn’s disease (CD) phenotype development has proven challenging due to difficulties in biopsy image interpretation of histologically similar yet biologically distinct phenotypes. At initial diagnosis, mostly CD patients are classified as B1 (inflammatory behavior), they typically either retain B1 phenotype or develop more complicated B2 (stricturing), B3 (internal penetrating), or B2/B3 phenotypes (defined by Montreal Classification). Prediction of phenotype development based on baseline biopsies can radically improve our clinical care by altering disease management. Biopsy-based image analysis via Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) has been successful in cancer detection, but investigation into its utility for CD phenotypes is lacking. We applied a machine learning CNN model to classify CD phenotypes and histologically normal ileal controls. Methods Baseline hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) stained ileal biopsy slides were obtained from the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center’s RISK validation sub cohort. At University of Virginia, biopsy slides were digitized, and a ResNet101 CNN model was trained. High resolution images were patched into 1000x1000 pixels with a 50% overlap and then resized to 256x256 pixels for training (80-20 split was kept between training and testing sets to ensure same patient patches were not mixed). Gradient Weighted Activating Mappings (GradCAMs) were used to visualize the model’s decision making process. Results We initially trained the model for CD vs. controls where it achieved 97% accuracy in detecting controls. We further trained it for classifying CD phenotypes (n=16 B1, n=16 B2, n=4 B3, n=13 B2/B3; phenotype decision at 5 year). It displayed a higher accuracy in detecting B2 (85%) while there were overlaps in the detection of other phenotypes (Figure 1). For B2, Grad-CAM heatmaps highlighted central pink areas within the lamina propria as the model’s regions of interests which were present when other phenotypes were misclassified as B2 (Figure 2). Conclusions: Here we highlight the potential utility of a machine learning image analysis model for describing CD phenotypes using H&E stained biopsies. Previous studies have shown B2 to be associated with increased activation for extracellular matrix genes (connective tissue component). Our GradCAM results support this finding as the pink central areas utilized by the model for classifying B2 could be connective tissue. Further confirmation via molecular phenotyping including Sirius Red immunohistochemistry is underway. Our work supports prediction of CD phenotypes using baseline biopsies at diagnosis and has potential to influence individualized care for children with CD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInflammatory Bowel DiseasesSame topicColorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionFrench-language works237,207