MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Cost-Utility Analysis of Nonsurgical Treatments for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women

2019· article· en· W4232426568 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea N. Simpson, Alaina Garbens, Fahima Dossa, Peter C. Coyte, Nancy N. Baxter, Colleen D. McDermott

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPelvic floor disorders treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's HospitalMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUrinary incontinenceUrinary systemStress incontinenceQuality of life (healthcare)ObstetricsGynecologyUrologyInternal medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(Abstracted from Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2019;25(1):49–55) Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) affects up to 30% of women older than 40 years and has a significant impact on a woman's quality of life. A recent study reported that a woman's lifetime risk of requiring surgery for SUI is 13.6% and increases with age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrical & Gynecological SurveySame topicPelvic floor disorders treatmentsFrench-language works237,207