MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

O aspecto social das ciências e a defesa da educação: Uma leitura contemporânea da epistemologia histórica de Gaston Bachelard

2017· article· pt· W4232447225 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEm Construção · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Pedagogy and Practices
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente artigo pretende abordar o aspecto social das ciências na epistemologia histórica de Bachelard por meio de sua defesa e valorização da educação. Esperamos responder por meio da defesa bachelardiana dos valores e da vocação científica às críticas que afirmam não ver em sua filosofia questões que ultrapassam o âmbito cognitivo da produção nas ciências. Para isso, realizamos uma análise comparada das contribuições filosóficas de Gaston Bachelard e da perspectiva dos Science Studies, a fim de apresentarmos os pontos de encontro e afastamento entre as duas abordagens. Ensaiamos, neste trabalho, provar que há uma proposta ético-política na epistemologia bachelardiana, qual seja a sua defesa da educação científica. Deste modo, buscamos não apenas corroborar nossa tese de que é possível, a partir de Bachelard, fazer uma leitura social da epistemologia histórica, como também defender a atualidade de seu pensamento.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.370
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it