Acute Vertigo in a Patient with Long-Term Organic Solvent Exposure: Importance of a Comprehensive Audio-Vestibular Test Battery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Ototoxicity induced by organic solvents has been identified in several groups of workers.Little is known, however, about the effects of organic solvents on the vestibular system. Purpose: The aim of the study was to comprehensively assess the vestibular system and auditory functionsin a worker exposed to organic solvents. Research Design: Both behavioral and physiological auditory and vestibular evaluations wereperformed. Results: No auditory-related findings associated with solvent exposure were found. The vestibulo-ocularreflex gain was abnormal for all semicircular canals with significant catch-up saccades, as measured bythe video head impulse test. The cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials was absent in the rightear and small but replicable in the left ear. Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential were bilaterallyabsent. Conclusions: The results suggest a case of vestibulotoxicity induced by a long history of organic solventexposure. We suggest that solvent-exposed individuals should be evaluated with a comprehensive batteryof auditory and vestibular tests.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".