MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232480132 · doi:10.2961/jlmn.2008.03.0008

http://www.jlps.gr.jp/jlmn/index.php?action=laser_volno&volno=303

2008· article· en· W4232480132 on OpenAlexfundno aff
W. Mróz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Laser Micro/Nanoengineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetallurgical and Alloy Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceIndex (typography)Computer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depositions of thin films, composed of Fe 81 BB 13.5 Si 3.5 Co 2 material were performed with ArF excimer laser ( = 193 nm). The material, with expected large magnetoelastic coefficient is potentially applicable in sensor and actuator technology. Depositions were done on polished <100> orientation Si substrates held at different temperatures: RT, 250 C, 450 C and 550 C. Results of AFM, MFM, SEM, EDS and FTIR measurements of the layers as a function of process parameters, in particular of the substrate temperature, are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.546
Threshold uncertainty score0.778

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4540.305

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Laser Micro/NanoengineeringSame topicMetallurgical and Alloy ProcessesFrench-language works237,207