MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232502625 · doi:10.1021/om051103z

Ethylene Polymerization Using Discrete Nickel(II) Iminophosphonamide Complexes

2006· article· en· W4232502625 on OpenAlexaff
Russell L. Stapleton, Jianfang Chai, Nicholas J. Taylor, Scott Collins

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganometallics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryIsomerizationLigand (biochemistry)PhosphoraneNickelEthylenePolymerizationDisproportionationAllyl bromideBromideStereochemistryMagnesium bromideCatalysisPolymer chemistryMedicinal chemistryPhotochemistryOrganic chemistryMagnesium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The syntheses and structures of the discrete (π-allyl)nickel iminophosphonamide (PN 2 ) complexes 2a − d from the reaction of (π-allyl)nickel bromide and the corresponding PN 2 ligands 3a, b or from the reaction of (π-allyl) 2 Ni and phosphorane 1 are reported. Complexes 2a, b are characterized by having long Ni−N distances coupled with an acute bite angle for the PN 2 ligand. The π-allyl ligands in complexes 2a − d are not fluxional on the NMR time scale at room temperature, although chemical exchange between the isomeric complexes 2c, d occurs via PN 2 ligand reorientation. Purified complexes 2a − d are not active for ethylene polymerization; it is only when complexes 2c, d are generated in situ in the presence of monomer that high- M w branched poly(ethylene) is formed. A variety of indirect evidence suggests that the active catalyst arises from the reaction of Ni(0)−alkene complexes with phosphorane 1, either preformed or generated in situ through decomposition of (π-allyl) 2 Ni. A bona fide PN 2 NiPh(PPh 3 ) complex, 5, was prepared from NiPh(PPh 3 ) 2 Br and the PN 2 ligand 3a and was structurally characterized. This complex is active for 1-hexene isomerization in the absence of an activator. During hexene isomerization, variable amounts of the paramagnetic bis(PN 2 ) complex 4 are produced along with ligand 3a . In addition, the fluxional intermediate 6, containing both a PN 2 ligand and coordinated PPh 3, is present during catalysis. Reaction of 5 with an equimolar amount of propene provides α-methylstyrene, the product of 1,2-insertion followed by β-H elimination. Complex 5 is not effective for polymerization or oligomerization of ethylene under a variety of conditions. The reactions of complex 5 with various phosphine scavengers were studied, and of these only Rh(acac)(C 2 H 4 ) 2 is both effective and selective for PPh 3 . Hard Lewis acids, including AlMe 3, B(C 6 F 5 ) 3, and PMAO, have a pronounced tendency toward abstraction of the PN 2 or other anionic ligands in these unhindered complexes. All of the complexes reported in this paper are extremely active for ethylene dimerization in the presence of PMAO. In the presence of stoichiometric Rh(I), complex 5 rapidly isomerizes 1-hexene and in the presence of ethylene produces branched PE oligomers at modest activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganometallicsSame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207