MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232508066 · doi:10.17559/tv-20180515175046

Influence of Fog-Haze on Dew Condensation in Urban Areas

2018· article· en· W4232508066 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yingying Xu, Hui Zhu, Yuepeng Pan, Jing Xie

Bibliographic record

VenueTehnicki vjesnik - Technical Gazette · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYouth Innovation Promotion AssociationPeople's Government of Jilin ProvinceYouth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of SciencesChina Scholarship CouncilUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsDewHazeCondensationEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyAtmospheric sciencesGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, fog-haze weather has frequently occurred in urban ecosystem, with accompanied dew condensation in the surface layer. Dew formation plays an important role in air purification, which takes fine aerosols in the atmosphere as the condensation nuclei. However, the influence of fog-haze on dew condensation remains unclear. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the influences of fog-haze days on the frequency, intensity, and duration of dew condensation, to reveal the factors relevant to dew condensation during weather pollution, and to improve the air quality in fog-haze days. The monitor-based direct weighing method was employed in this study to observe the vapour condensation in urban greenbelt under fog-haze and normal weather conditions during the frost-free season (April-October 2017) in Changchun, China. The differences in dew condensation intensity and frequency were discriminated under different weather conditions. Then, the influences of fog-haze days on the vapour condensation were analyzed by monitoring the velocity and duration of dew condensation in polluted weather. Finally, a program for improving air quality was proposed based on the analysis of major meteorological factors that affect the dew condensation during the fog-haze days. Results show that the dew condensation velocity decreases significantly (P < 0.01) from 0.0067 mm/h in normal weather to 0.0026 mm/h in a fog-haze day, whereas the condensation duration is prolonged. The dew condensation intensities are 0.064, 0.045, and 0.051 mm/d under fog, haze, and normal weather conditions, respectively, and the fog-haze weather has no significant effect on the frequency or intensity of dew condensation (P > 0.05). The particulate matter concentration, wind speed, air pressure, relative humidity, and solar radiation are the main factors that affect the vapour transport during the fog-haze days. Artificial increase of surface layer vapours can promote the particulates to absorb vapours fully and settle to the ground in the form of dew, thereby reducing the particulate matter concentration within the scope of human activities. The present study supplements the eigenvalues for dew condensation in urban areas during special pollution periods and reveals the influence of fog-haze on the night time vapour condensation in urban areas. Findings of this study provide theoretical basis for further developing the programs for controlling fog-haze weather and improving urban air quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTehnicki vjesnik - Technical GazetteSame topicTropical and Extratropical Cyclones ResearchFrench-language works237,207