MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232511835 · doi:10.17771/pucrio.acad.36487

O CASO ARACRUZ DO ESPÍRITO SANTO: VIOLAÇÕES E RESISTÊNCIA À LUZ DA COSMOLOGIA GUARANI MBYA

2018· dissertation· pt· W4232511835 on OpenAlexaff
TATIANA DOS SANTOS ARAUJO

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Racism, and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Labour, Employment and Social Solidarity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsViolaGeographyHumanitiesCartographyArtArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[pt] Essa dissertação é resultado de pesquisa bibliográfica sobre o grupo guarani mbya que, ao longo das últimas décadas migrou do Paraguai ao Espírito Santo, e de sua luta contra a empresa Aracruz Celulose pelo direito à terra que escolheu para viver. A partir da descrição de trabalhos que contam essa trajetória e com informações de investigações etnográficas sobre a cosmologia guarani, o trabalho utilizará o método experimental para comprovar o fato de que este povo guarani foi submetido a violências graves, tais como, o deslocamento forçado, o etnocídio e o genocídio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.642
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMigration, Racism, and Human RightsFrench-language works237,207