MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232551230 · doi:10.1016/j.vgie.2019.01.009

Karen L. Woods, MD

2019· editorial· ceb· W4232551230 on OpenAlexaff
Karen Woods, Karen Married, Michael S. Osato, Carol A. Burke, Ana Lok, Hisao Tajiri, Jges Board, Haruhiro Inoue, Jges Secre- Tariat

Bibliographic record

VenueVideoGIE · 2019
Typeeditorial
Languageceb
FieldHealth Professions
TopicVeterinary Practice and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGerontologyLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dr Karen Woods (Author photos 1-13; Video 1, available online at www.VideoGIE.org) was born in Joplin, Missouri, and grew up in Kansas City with her father, an accountant, and her mother, a dedicated homemaker. She is the older of 2 children. At the age of 11, she wanted to be a veterinarian and joined the local Future Farmers of America chapter. In sixth grade, her plans changed after she studied the human body, which fascinated her, and she decided to become a physician with the goal to become a heart or brain surgeon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.284

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0850.050

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.335
GPT teacher head0.534
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVideoGIESame topicVeterinary Practice and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207