MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232568651 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14646192

FPGA-Based Stereo-Vision System Mimicking Human Binocular Vision

2021· preprint· en· W4232568651 on OpenAlexaff
Gvarami Labartkava

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Measurement and Detection Methods
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer visionStereopsisArtificial intelligenceMachine visionField-programmable gate arrayTracking systemObject detectionReal-time computingEmbedded systemPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human vision is a complex system which involves processing frames and retrieving information in a real-time with optimization of the memory, energy and computational resources usage. It can be widely utilized in many real-world applications from security systems to space missions. The research investigates fundamental principles of human vision and accordingly develops a FPGA-based video processing system with binocular vision, capable of high performance and real-time tracking of moving objects in 3D space. The undertaken research and implementation consist of: 1. Analysis of concepts and methods of human vision system; 2. Development stereo and peripheral vision prototype of a system-on-programmable chip (SoPC) for multi-object motion detection and tracking; 3. Verification, test run and analysis of the experimental results gained on the prototype and associated with the performance constraints; The implemented system proposes a platform for real-time applications which are limited in current approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Measurement and Detection MethodsFrench-language works237,207