MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232587003 · doi:10.1186/s12998-016-0111-1

Erratum to: Spinal manipulative therapy, Graston technique® and placebo for non-specific thoracic spine pain: a randomised controlled trial

2016· erratum· en· W4232587003 on OpenAlexaff
Amy Crothers, Simon French, Jeffrey J. Hébert, Bruce F. Walker

Bibliographic record

VenueChiropractic & Manual Therapies · 2016
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineManual therapyThoracic spinePhysical therapyPlaceboBack painSpinal manipulationRehabilitationRandomized controlled trialChiropracticThoracic vertebraeAlternative medicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationSurgeryLumbar vertebraePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The competing interest section of this article [1] is incorrect. The competing interests section should be as follows: BFW is Editor-in-Chief of Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, SDF is Deputy Editor-in-Chief, and JJH is an Associate Editor, however none of these authors had any involvement in the editorial process for this manuscript. The publisher apologises for any inconvenience caused.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.488
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChiropractic & Manual TherapiesSame topicSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyFrench-language works237,207