MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232600893 · doi:10.1007/978-94-6351-164-3_10

Respect

2017· book-chapter· en· W4232600893 on OpenAlexaff
Ellyn Lyle

Bibliographic record

VenueSensePublishers eBooks · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCounseling Practices and Supervision
Canadian institutionsYorkville University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShetlandOutcome (game theory)GeographyPsychologyForestryMathematicsMathematical economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Building a relationship based on choice, communication, and trust often starts with respect. Spotty taught me this first memorable lesson in the field—well, the orchard, actually. We were perfectly suited, he and I: we were both about half the height of others in our species (he was a small Shetland pony, and I was 5 years old); equally independent in thought, we were both determined to control the outcome of our first conjoined experience; and cocky, neither of us had any doubt we’d persevere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensePublishers eBooksSame topicCounseling Practices and SupervisionFrench-language works237,207