MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PTH-078 A Prospective Evaluation of the Predictive Value of Faecal Calprotectin in Quiescent Crohn’S Disease

2013· article· en· W4232645938 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
L A Smith, G Naismith, S Barry, Jan Munro, S Laird, K Rankin, J Morris, J W Winter, D R Gaya

Bibliographic record

VenueGut · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFaecal calprotectinCrohn's diseaseCalprotectinInternal medicineReceiver operating characteristicDiseaseProspective cohort studyCohortGastroenterologyInflammatory bowel disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Studies have suggested that faecal calprotectin (FC) levels may increase early in inflammatory bowel disease relapse before the patient is symptomatic and thus may be useful to identify patients at a higher risk of relapsing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of FC in predicting relapse in patients followed up for a minimum of 12 months and to ascertain the best cut-off for this in our cohort of adult patients with quiescent Crohn’s disease (CD). Methods Patients with CD in clinical remission were recruited and followed up prospectively for a minimum of 12 months. Participants provided stool for FC concentration analysis and the study was terminated once the last recruited patient reached a follow up period of 365 days. Remission was defined as a Crohn’s disease activity index (CDAI) of < 150. Relapse was defined as either a need for escalation of medical therapy, surgery for active CD or progression of disease phenotype using the Montreal classification. The study was approved by the West of Scotland Research Ethics Service (REC reference 10/S0704/1). The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve of relapse by 12 months, based on FC value at baseline, was calculated. Kaplan-Meier curves of time to relapse, some of which were longer than 12 months, were based on the resulting best FC cut-off value for predicting relapse (with patients who had not relapsed being censored at end of follow-up) and compared using the log-rank tests. Results 98 patients were recruited. One patient was lost to follow up, 1 died and the care of 3 patients was transferred to another centre, before either relapsing or being followed up for 12 months. Of the 93 remaining patients 11 (12%) had relapsed by 12 months. The median FC was lower for non-relapsers, 96 µg/g (IQR 39–237), than for relapsers, 328 µg/g (IQR 189–574), (p = 0.008). The area under the ROC curve to predict relapse using FC was 74.8% (Figure 1). A cut-off FC value of 240 µg/g to predict relapse of quiescent Crohn’s disease over the course of one year was associated with a sensitivity of 72.7% and specificity of 74.3%. Negative predictive value was high at 95.3% and positive predictive value was 27.6%.There was a significant difference in time to relapse for those with the first FC value below or above 240 µg/g (p = 0.011). Conclusion In this prospective dataset, FC appears to be a useful, non-invasive tool to help identify quiescent Crohn’s disease patients at a low risk of relapse over the ensuing 12 months. A FC value of 240 µg/g was deemed the best cut-off value in our patients. Disclosure of Interest None Declared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score0.304

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGutSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207