MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232700511 · doi:10.1107/s1600536806014966

Bis(cyclopentenylacetato)tetramethyldistannoxane dimer

2006· article· en· W4232700511 on OpenAlexaff
Aftab Ahmad, Azim Khan, Saqib Ali, Masood Parvez

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section E Structure Reports Online · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Compounds Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDimerCrystallographyTrigonal bipyramidal molecular geometryChemistryLigand (biochemistry)StereochemistryCrystal structureBipyramidBond lengthMolecular geometryMoleculeReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The crystal structure of the title compound, tetra-μ2-(cyclopent-2-enyl)acetato-1:2κ2 O:O′;1:3κ2 O:O′;2:4κ2 O:O′;3:4κ2 O:O′-octamethyl-1κ2 C,2κ2 C,3κ2 C,4κ2 C-di-μ3-oxo-1:2:3κ3 O;2:3:4κ3 O-tetratin(IV), [Sn4(CH3)8(C7H9O2)4O2], is composed of discrete centrosymmetric dimers lying about inversion centres. The cyclopentenylacetate ligand shows different modes of coordination with Sn, as a result of which the central Sn2O2 core is fused with two four-membered (Sn2O2) and two six-membered (Sn2O3C) rings. The endocyclic Sn atoms are six-coordinate in a skew-trapezoidal bipyramidal environment. The exocyclic Sn atoms are five-coordinate and show distorted trigonal–bipyramidal geometry. The Sn—C distances lie in a very narrow range [2.095 (4)–2.113 (4) Å], while the Sn—O distances range between 2.030 (3) and 2.280 (3) Å for strong bonds and a value of 2.654 (3) Å for the relatively weak Sn—O bond.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section E Structure Reports OnlineSame topicOrganometallic Compounds Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207