MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232714785 · doi:10.1093/pch/7.2.71

Ecstasy

2002· article· en· W4232714785 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Rieder

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicForensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Western Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcstasyMedicineTraditional medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ecstasy, or 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, is an amphetamine derivative that has been used as a recreational drug since the mid-1980s, especially in connection with rave parties. This drug acts by affecting how neurotransmitters send signals in the brain that produce feelings of euphoria and well-being. When taken recreationally in settings such as rave parties, ecstasy is used to ‘enhance the vibe’, taking advantage of the effects of the drug on mood. Ecstasy is well absorbed when taken orally and works quickly. Although the majority of people who take ecstasy do so without undesirable effects, there are serious complications associated with the use of ecstasy. Common short term problems include tachycardia, sweating, muscle spasms and extremely high fever (38.5°C to 43°C). In cases of severe toxicity, the patient has a high fever that can progress to rhabdomyolysis, renal failure, seizures, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, cardiac arrhythmias and death. There have been at least 58 deaths associated with the use of ecstasy over the past eight years worldwide, with six of these death occurring in Canada. There is very limited treatment available for the severe complications of ecstasy toxicity, and this treatment is primarily supportive. Given the prominence of hyperthermia as a component of adverse effects to ecstasy, a course of dantrolene sodium, as used in the therapy of malignant hyperthermia, would be a reasonable therapeutic option. There are some factors common to raves that increase the risk of severe toxicity from ecstasy. These factors include high room temperatures (in excess of 30°C), vigorous activity (such as prolonged periods of dancing) and limited access to water or other beverages, which can lead to dehydration. Additionally, as with any illegal drug, there are concerns about purity, contamination and the possibility that other drugs are being sold as ecstasy. As an example, tablets sold at raves and labelled as ecstasy have been found to contain ketamine, a drug that can be associated with hallucinogenic toxicity, instead of ecstasy. There are some data that suggest that the long term use of ecstasy and similar compounds in animal models leads to significant and apparently permanent changes in neuro-transmitter concentrations in the central nervous system. This effect is very troubling and suggests that the long term use of ecstasy may be associated with long term neurological consequences. There are two considerations for paediatricians. The first relates to the evaluation of patients who may have ingested ecstasy. The acute evaluation of these patients starts with the ABCs — management of airway, breathing and circulation — and evaluation of core body temperature, hydration and renal function. Management includes supportive therapy and the use of dantrolene when hyperthermia is present. It is important that the paediatrician recognizes the possibility of exposures to other drugs and the possibility of issues such as sexual assault. Patients should be monitored closely in an appropriate facility until they are stable, and the paediatrician is encouraged to make use of regional resources such as poison control centres. The second consideration relates to harm reduction, notably counselling and risk reduction for adolescents. All adolescents who plan to attend a rave should be aware of these risk factors. Strategies to reduce the risks include ensuring that adolescents know the risks associated with the use of drugs such as ecstasy, that they know what some of the warning signs of toxicity are (high fever, very rapid heart rate), that they are aware of the risks of contamination of drugs with other drugs, and that they take frequent breaks and ensure that they drink water or other nonalcoholic beverages frequently. As well, teens that attend a rave party should not attend alone; they should take a friend with them so that they can look out for each other. These problems point to the importance of adolescents understanding the potential dangers that can occur when drugs such as ecstasy are used. The best treatment for the problems associated with ecstasy is prevention. Physicians and parents should discuss issues, such as drug use and attendance at rave parties, with their teens in an open and nonjudgemental manner. The emphasis of these conversations should be on how to avoid harm and reduce risk. Parents, physicians and groups such as the Canadian Paediatric Society are concerned about risks related to the use of drugs such as ecstasy by teens. In the shared goal of safety for teens, information is the best weapon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicForensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisFrench-language works237,207