MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232768317 · doi:10.22374/cjgim.v9i3.16

Löfgren Syndrome Developing during Infliximab Therapy for Crohn's Disease: A Case Report

2014· article· en· W4232768317 on OpenAlexaffvenue
I. Coman, José Manuel Casillas Domínguez, Annie Bélisle

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of General Internal Medicine · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research
Canadian institutionsHôpital Notre-Dame
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInfliximabSarcoidosisErythema nodosumRheumatoid arthritisTumor necrosis factor alphaDiseaseCrohn's diseaseDermatologyArthritisAdalimumabInflammatory bowel diseaseImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) antagonists are biological response modifiers increasingly used to effectively treat a wide array of inflammatory diseases such as Crohn’s disease and rheumatoid arthritis. Anti-TNFα agents are also used in the treatment of steroid-refractory granulomatous diseases, with reported success. Paradoxically, an increasing number of cases of anti-TNF–induced sarcoidosis are being reported. The acute form of sarcoidosis, Löfgren syndrome, is characterized by mediastinal adenopathy, erythema nodosum, arthralgia, and fever. This article describes the case of a patient with Crohn's disease who developed Löfgren syndrome during treatment with infliximab. To our knowledge, this is the first case of Löfgren syndrome developing during treatment with a TNFα antagonist.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0080.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of General Internal MedicineSame topicSarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity ResearchFrench-language works237,207