MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232794982 · doi:10.1111/jgh.12736_11

Viral Hepatitis

2014· article· en· W4232794982 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis Viruses Studies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryToronto Liver CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVirologyViral hepatitisHepatitis C

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aims: Occupational injuries, including needlestick (NS) and blood and body fluid (BF) exposures can have a deleterious impact on the physical and psychological health of the exposed and the latter can occur regardless of whether transmission occurs 1 . Similarly, the financial impact remains significant even in the absence of transmission, and provides further impetus to reduce the occurrence of occupational injuries. The reported risk of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) transmission after occupational injury from an infected patient is 0.4%-3% 2,3 . We aimed to identify commonly implicated factors associated with occupational injuries, the cumulative financial impact of injuries and the likelihood of transmission from HCV Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) positive sources. Methods: Data relating to NS and BF exposures occurring between 1995 and 2014 at a single tertiary center was prospectively collected by the local Staff Occupational Health Department and included factors surrounding occurrence, financial expenses and source viral hepatitis status. A subset of data for HCV PCR positive sources was also analyzed with respect to seroconversion rates. Results: 3494 exposures were recorded from January 1995 to May 2014, of which 2344 were NS, and 1150 BF exposures. The most frequent healthcare workers (HCWs) implicated were nursing staff (50%) and junior doctors (25%). Common geographical locations for exposure occurrence were hospital wards (31%), operating theatres (24%) and intensive care units (12%). The source patient was identifiable in over 90% of cases. Sharp items for injection (25%) or suturing (21%) were most commonly implicated in NS exposures with the hands (95.3%) being the most frequent body site exposed. Blood or blood products (61%), followed by saliva (13%) were the most likely BF exposures, with conjunctiva (64%) and intact skin (49%) the most commonly exposed body parts. The total cost of exposures was estimated at $800 484, which included laboratory and infection control personnel expenses. Of the 2704 sources for whom HCV status was known, 351 sources were HCV PCR positive. There was no documented HCV transmission in HCWs exposed to positive sources (155 NS and 196 BF), with serological follow up extending to a minimum of 6 months following exposure. Conclusion: Occupational exposures continue to pose a health and financial burden despite preventative measures. The absence of transmission from 351 HCV PCR positive sources is lower than expected from previously reported rates. Nonetheless, given such exposures are associated with a substantial financial burden and potential for psychological impact regardless of whether transmission occurs, ongoing measures are required to further minimize occupational exposures in HCWs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Gastroenterology and HepatologySame topicHepatitis Viruses Studies and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207