MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232794984 · doi:10.1109/mwsym.2011.5973327

Image quality enhancement in the microwave raster scanning method

2011· article· en· W4232794984 on OpenAlexaff
A. Khalatpour, R. K. Amineh, Haiyuan Xu, Y. Baskharoun, N. K. Nikolova

Bibliographic record

Venue2011 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeconvolutionRaster graphicsMicrowaveRaster scanComputer scienceHolographyMicrowave imagingBlind deconvolutionAperture (computer memory)Computer visionAntenna (radio)Artificial intelligenceAlgorithmOpticsTelecommunicationsPhysicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given, as follows. We propose signal processing algorithms to improve the quality of the images obtained with microwave raster scanning measurements. These algorithms include: (1) blind deconvolution and (2) microwave holography. The first algorithm removes the integration effect of the antenna aperture using complex-valued blind deconvolution. The second algorithm implements near-field microwave holographic imaging applied to the data already processed by the first algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2011 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave SymposiumSame topicElectromagnetic Compatibility and MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207