MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232795365 · doi:10.1353/ral.2004.0103

Hearing Voices, or, Who You Calling Postcolonial? The Evolution of Djebar's Poetics

2004· article· en· W4232795365 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Clarisse Zimra

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch in African Literatures · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipNationalismHistoryPoeticsState (computer science)Art historyOrder (exchange)PoetryArtHumanitiesLiteratureLawPolitical sciencePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monolingualism of the Other, or, The Prosthesis of Origin. By Jacques Derrida. Trans. Patrick Mensah Stanford: Stanford UP, 1998. 95 pp. Ces voix qui m'assiègent By Assia Djebar Paris: Albin Michel, 1999. 271 pp. Recasting Postcolonialism By Anne Donadey Portsmouth: Heinemann, 2001. 178 pp. Assia Djebar ou la résisitance de l'écriture: regards d'un écrivain d'Algérie By Mireille Calle-Gruber Paris: Maison larose, 2001. 282 pp. Experimental Nations, or The Invention of the Maghreb By Réda Bensmaia. Trans. Alyson Waters Princeton: Princeton UP, 2003. 215 pp. [End Page 149] It has been almost half a century since a timid but determined student at the prestigious Ecole Normale in Paris decided to sit out the compulsory final exams in order to manifest her support to the nationalist war then being waged in Algeria, her birth country. For this audacity, biting the hand that was feeding (or taming) her since she had been admitted on a state scholarship, she was to be punished with being barred from ever graduating. Only the personal intervention of one General de Gaulle overturned the decision. By the time she graduated, Assia Djebar had published La soif (Julliard 1956), a novel undertaken, she said, to pass the time. This was not her first. She had already tried her hand earlier at a "thick and fat manuscript, a sort of historical novel on the war" that she gave up, she says, because she did not quite have the necessary breadth for such an ambitious project. Real history intervened. Newly married to a young nationalist wanted by the French police, she was soon on the run. Many years later, with Ces voix qui m'assiègent (1999), a confident writer takes the full measure of her craft. Mapping the birthing of a considerable oeuvre, she articulates in this rich collection a poetics predicated on a fully gendered engagement with history that wears its ethical imperative on its sleeve, and insists we do likewise. These essays were first presented in May 1999 as a doctoral dissertation, "Le roman maghrébin francophone. Entre les langues, entre les cultures: quarante ans d'un parcours: ASSIA DJEBAR 1957-97," under the direction of Jeanne-Marie Clerc at Université Paul Valéry (Montpellier, France). Somewhat rewritten, with modified or reshuffled parts, the book came out within weeks, in two simultaneous editions. The first one, with Les Presses de l'université de Montréal, was soon after awarded the prize for best collection of essays from the scholarly Canadian journal Etudes françaises. It bore a double title, Ces VOIX qui m'assiègent, in large, black capital letters, with VOIX printed twice as large and twice as bold on a warm golden-beige cover that reproduced the shiny undulations of sand dunes. Readers familiar with the Djebarian corpus will immediately think of the exiled, disappeared queen of Vaste est la prison, "Tin-Hinan, ensevelie au ventre de l'Afrique" (150), swallowed up in the belly of Africa, with whom disappears the primal writing of an entire continent. A discrete subtitle follows in much smaller lower case letters, caesural punctuation included, . . . en marge de ma francophonie, a typographical pause clearly meant for a Canadian francophone readership. The second, published in Paris with Albin Michel, used only the first half of the title, in sober lowercase letters on the soberly traditional buff white, as it did on the first inside page. The doubled-up title does not appear until the second inner page. Both versions, however, are textually identical, down to the pagination. The project was birthed by the valiantly serendipitous effort of Canadian scholars who had lamented to Dejbar that her critical works were hard to find, thus diminishing the full measure of her achievements. This has included locating as well a variety of forewords and lectures delivered all over the world, sometimes...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.022
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch in African LiteraturesSame topicAfrican history and culture studiesFrench-language works237,207