MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4232814370 · doi:10.4095/224963

Surficial geology and landslide inventory of the middle Sea to Sky corridor, British Columbia

2008· report· en· W4232814370 on OpenAlexaffabout
A Blais-Stevens

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLandslideGeologySkyArchaeologyPhysical geographyOceanographyGeomorphologyGeographyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The surficial geology and landslide inventory of the middle Sea to Sky Corridor provides a record of the late Quaternary history of the map area in southern British Columbia near the edge of the former Cordilleran Ice Sheet. The map depicts a variety of sediment units of glacial and non-glacial origin superposed on a hillshade DEM. From oldest to youngest, the units are bedrock, till, glaciofluvial deposits, glaciomarine deposits, alluvium, colluvium, and organic deposits. Landslides are identified and classified in the colluvium units. Till was deposited by glacier ice and consists of boulder- to pebble-sized clasts in a matrix of sand, silt, and clay. Glaciofluvial deposits consist of stratified, well sorted to poorly sorted sand and gravel. They are associated with terraces and blankets. Glaciomarine deposits consist of stratified, well sorted to poorly sorted sand and gravel and silty clay muds. They are also fossiliferous in some places. They are associated with terraces and blankets. Alluvium consists of fine silt, sand, and minor gravel deposited along modern streams after deglaciation. Colluvium is derived from bedrock, till, glaciofluvial deposits that failed. Organic deposits include peat and organic-rich muds that have accumulated in poorly drained depressions formed in older sediments and bedrock.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLandslides and related hazards→French-language works237,207→