MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232828828 · doi:10.31219/osf.io/4da3f

GEOGRAPHYCAL INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) BASED EMPLOYEE MAPPING PT ASTRA DAIHATSU MOTOR

2018· preprint· en· W4232828828 on OpenAlexaff
SAEPUDIN NIRWAN

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEdcuational Technology Systems
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsASTRATask (project management)Computer scienceAutomotive industryCompensation (psychology)EngineeringDatabaseSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PT Astra Daihatsu Motor consisting of Stamping Plant, Engine Plant, Casting Plant, Assembly Plant, Head Office and Part Center that contain many employee about nine thousand spread at JABODETABEK'S region. Since often its happening disaster as accident of flood at territorial JABODETABEK makes PT.Astra Daihatsu is Motor as corporate as professional, issuing policy to give compensation to employee one strikes that accident. Human Resources Development (HRD) that have task in brings off and service employee perceive handicap to give compensation to employee in point since haven't marked sense data about employee domicile.To it at makes database that valid to know employee mapping at a given location. Method that is utilized in final task writing this by use of modelling tool as Flow is Folder (Documents Flowing charts), DFD (Flow's Data Diagram) and data collecting tech with pervading form domicile, observation trick, and interview. Meanwhile application development tool database utilizes Mysql and with programming languages PHP for webite's application and Flash for map. Result to this scheme is one System which given by name Geographycal Information System (GIS) Based Employee Mapping PT.Astra Daihatsu is Motor .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEdcuational Technology SystemsFrench-language works237,207