Bibliographic record
Abstract
I am writing this editorial while attending the Annual Professional Development conference at the RCOG and can't help noticing how often the subject of obesity comes up. The UK is apparently the fattest nation in Europe with the Republic of Ireland having nothing to be proud about either; all credit to Poland whose inhabitants are positively svelte by comparison. Mohammed Khairy and Madhurima Rajkhowa focus their review on obesity-related infertility. Various professional bodies have stipulated a body mass index of <30−35 kg/m2 before assisted reproduction techniques can be offered. The authors consider the evidence, ethics and interventions. Pradeep Jayaram and colleagues give us a detailed review of caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. This is a condition that seems to have been increasingly recognised but until recently there was little advice on non-tubal ectopic pregnancy and it was not covered in the latest guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE; CG154). It has a greater risk of severe morbidity compared with tubal ectopic pregnancy, partly due to a delayed diagnosis. TOG has published articles on interstitial and abdominal pregnancy and the new RCOG Green-top Guideline, released in November 2016 (GTG 21), not only sets out diagnostic criteria for caesarean section ectopic pregnancy but also covers abdominal, cervical, ovarian, cornual and interstitial pregnancy. It is a heightened awareness that will lead to earlier diagnosis. This article goes into more detail than GTG 21, making it a valuable resource for clinicians. Sana Usman and colleagues discuss the role of magnesium sulfate for neuroprotection in preterm deliveries. While magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) has long been validated as safe and important in the control and prevention of eclampsia, the evidence to support the prevention of cerebral palsy associated with preterm deliveries has taken longer to establish. What seems clear now is that MgSO4 has a modest neuroprotective effect and is currently recommended for use in deliveries less than 30−32 weeks of gestation. The timing, dose and duration of treatment remains undefined; however, most recommend a standard pre-eclampsia protocol used within 4 hours of delivery. The article by Nicholas Reed and Azmat Sadozye considers radiotherapy in gynaecological malignancy. Planning and targeting of treatment has been improved by new imaging modalities and better radiotherapy techniques. The mainstay of radiotherapy is still adjunctive, or in other words after primary surgery. The exception being primary treatment for some cervical and vaginal cancers. For those without an oncology interest, we still need to be aware of ‘late effects’, such as ovarian failure and the psychosexual consequences of vaginal brachytherapy. Susanna Crowe and Sanjula Sharma present a practical guide to quality improvement. They point out that it is not only our duty to engage with processes to enhance the patient experience but also that quality assurance and improvement are embedded as key elements in professional revalidation and a mandatory requirement for trainees. Kevin Cooper and Lucky Saraswat present part 1 of a comprehensive review of the surgical management of heavy menstrual bleeding. For those who cannot wait for part 2, it is available online as an early view article. In part 1 the authors describe endometrial ablation techniques, continuing the debate of ‘which is the best ablation method?’ The article should be considered alongside the 2016 NICE clinical guideline for heavy menstrual bleeding (CG44), with reference to endometrial ablation in section 1.6. The dangers of diabetic ketoacidosis are exacerbated in pregnancy due to challenges with respect to diagnosis, management and prevention. Not only is the incidence of pregnancy-associated diabetes increasing, pregnancy physiology also increases susceptibility to ketoacidosis. Therefore, we welcomed the proposal for the paper by Manoj Mohan and colleagues. The TOG team have supplemented this with an infographic, which is available online. Desiree Kolomainen and colleagues discuss the surgical (and non-surgical) management of bowel obstruction in gynaecological cancer. These patients have often had ovarian cancer treated several years earlier and present as an emergency to the colorectal surgical team with either recurrent disease or adhesion-related obstruction. Decisions for surgery ideally require multidisciplinary and palliative care input bearing in mind the risks and possible short-term benefit. There is no level 1 evidence or national guideline available and surgery is usually performed with palliative intent. This article is particularly useful when faced with an acute admission in general gynaecology and/or to inform surgical colleagues. In this issue we also have the MBRRACE-UK 2016 summary update and key messages from Professor Marian Knight. The overall maternal death rate in the UK was unchanged from the last report, at 8.54 per 100 000. However, specifically highlighted is the need for improved joint working between maternity and cardiac services for women presenting (and often re-presenting) with cardiac symptoms. The summary does recognise good practice in evidence-based care with low death rates related to hypertension. Professor James Drife uses his academic skills to research medical graduate reunions! Perhaps medical reunions have been replaced by virtual real-time reunions or what some call ‘Facebook Friends’. Editorial board Mark Roberts MD MRCOG Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne Mohamed Abdel-Fattah FRCOG University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen George Attilakos MD MRCOG University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London George Attilakos MD MRCOG University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London Philippa Corson MRCOG North Middlesex Hospital, London (Trainee Representative) Kate Harding FRCOG Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London Justin Konje FMCOG (Nig) FWACS MRCOG University of Leicester, Leicester (Lead CPD Editor) Bid Kumar FRCOG Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Wrexham Kate Langford MA MD MBA FRCOG Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London Jo Morrison BM BCh MA MRCOG DPhil (Oxon) Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton Nicola Mullin MFFP FRCOG Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Chester Surabhi Nanda MRCOG Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool Thomas Tang MD MRCOG Regional Fertility Centre, Royal Maternity Hospital, Belfast Ephia Yasmin MRCOG University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London Jason Waugh MRCOG (Emeritus Editor) Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne International advisory board Richard Brown MBBS DFSRH FRCOG FACOG McGillUniversityHealthCentre,Montreal,Canada, Amr El-Shalakany MSc MD FRCOG Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, Cairo, Egypt Carman Lai MRCOG FHKCOG FHKAM (O&G) Cert RCOG (Maternal and Fetal Medicine) Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Henry Murray MRCOG Australia Dimitrios Koleskas MRCOG Euroclinic, Athens, Greece N Rajamaheswari MD DGO MCh (Urology) Director, Urogynaecology Research Center Pvt Ltd, India Duru Shah MD FCPS FICS FICOG DGO DFP FICMCH Jaslok Hospital, Sir Hurkinsondas Hospital and Breach Candy Research Centers, India David Shaker FRCSEd FRCOG FRANZCOG University of Queensland, Rockhampton Base Hospital and Mater Private Hospital, Australia
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".