MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232897458 · doi:10.1097/jdn.0000000000000027

Research Highlights

2014· article· en· W4232897458 on OpenAlexaffabout
Fiona Lovegrove

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Dermatology Nurses’ Association · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResearch centreLibrary scienceSuiteSociologyMedia studiesPolitical scienceComputer scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fiona Lovegrove PhD, MD, Dermatology Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON. The author declares no conflicts of interest. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Fiona Lovegrove, PhD, MD, Dermatology Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Suite M1-700, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5.E-mail: [email protected]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1460.058

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Dermatology Nurses’ AssociationSame topicDermatology and Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207