MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232902259 · doi:10.1017/s1092852900014826

CNS volume 11 issue 10 Cover and Front matter

2006· article· en· W4232902259 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCNS Spectrums · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSchool of Medicine, Emory UniversityUniversity of California, San DiegoSchool of Medicine, Stanford UniversityUniversità degli Studi di FirenzeUniversity of PittsburghVanderbilt University Medical CenterYork UniversityVanderbilt UniversityEmory UniversityRheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität BonnUniversität WienMassachusetts General Hospital
KeywordsFront coverCover (algebra)Volume (thermodynamics)Front (military)Action (physics)Content (measure theory)Computer scienceGeographyPhysicsMathematicsEngineeringMeteorologyMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consult the full prescribing information for complete product information. Daytrana {methyl phenidate transdermal system) CM Rx Only INDICATION AND USAGE Attention Deficit Hyperactlvlty Disorder (ADHD): Daytrana (methylphenidate transdermal system) is indicated for the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and is available in 10,15, 20, and 30 mg dosing strengths. The efficacy of Oaytrana was established in two controlled clinical trials in children with ADHD. Special Diagnostic Considerations: Specific etiology of this syndrome is unknown, and there is no single diagrjostic test. Adequate diagnosis requires the use not only of medical but of special psychological, educational, and social resources. Learning may or may not be impaired. The diagnosis must be based upon a complete history and evaluation of the child and not solely on the presence of the required number of DSM-IV-TFP characteristics. Naed for Comprehensive Treatment Program: Daytrana is indicated as an integral part of a total treatment program for ADHD that may include other measures (psychological, educational, social) for patients with this syndrome. Drug treatment may not be indicated for all children with this syndrome. Stimulants are not intended for use in the child who exhibits symptoms secondary to environmental factors and/or other primary psychiatric disorders, including psychosis. Appropriate educational placement is essential and psychosocial intervention is often helpful. When remedial measures alone are insufficient, the decision to prescribe stimulant medication will depend upon the physician's assessment of the chronicity and severity of the child's symptoms. Long-Term Use: The effectiveness of Daytrana for long-term use, i.e., for more than 7 weeks, has not been systematically evaluated in controlled trials. The physician who elects to use Daytrana for extended periods should periodically re-evaluate the long-term usefulness of Daytrana for the individual patient (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION). CONTRAINDICATIONS Agitation: Daytrana is contraindicated in patients with marked anxiety, tension, and agitation, since the drug may aggravate these symptoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.801

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1990.331

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCNS SpectrumsSame topicDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207