Solute Transport Controls Membrane Tension and Organellar Volume
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The regulation of cellular volume in response to osmotic change has largely been studied at the whole cell level. Such regulation occurs by the inhibition or activation of ionic and organic solute transport pathways at the cell surface and is coincident with remodelling of the plasma membrane. However, it is only in rare instances that osmotic insults are experienced by cells and tissues. By contrast, the relatively minute luminal volumes of membrane-bound organelles are constantly subject to shifts in their solute concentrations as exemplified in the endocytic pathway where these evolve alongside with maturation. In this review, we summarize recent evidence that suggests trafficking events are in fact orchestrated by the solute fluxes of organelles that briefly impose osmotic gradients. We first describe how hydrostatic pressure and the resultant tension on endomembranes can be readily dissipated by controlled solute efflux since water is obliged to exit. In such cases, the relief of tension on the limiting membrane of the organelle can promote its remodelling by coat proteins, ESCRT machinery, and motors. Second, and reciprocally, we propose that osmotic gradients between organellar lumens and the cytosol may persist or be created. Such gradients impose osmotic pressure and tension on the endomembrane that prevent its remodelling. The control of endomembrane tension is dysregulated in lysosomal storage disorders and can be usurped by pathogens in endolysosomes. Since trafficking and signaling pathways conceivably sense and respond to endomembrane tension, we anticipate that understanding how cells control organellar volumes and the movement of endocytic fluid in particular will be an exciting new area of research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".