MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232991790 · doi:10.1002/9781118633953.ch12

Sampling and Aliasing in Image Reconstruction

2014· other· en· W4232991790 on OpenAlexaff
Robert W. Brown, Yu‐Chung N. Cheng, E. Mark Haacke, Michael R. Thompson, Ramesh Venkatesan

Bibliographic record

VenueMagnetic Resonance Imaging · 2014
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAliasingNyquist–Shannon sampling theoremSampling (signal processing)Nyquist frequencyCoherent samplingNoise (video)AlgorithmDiscretizationTruncation (statistics)Signal reconstructionIterative reconstructionOversamplingAnti-aliasingMathematicsSIGNAL (programming language)Nonuniform samplingComputer scienceImage (mathematics)Computer visionSignal processingFilter (signal processing)StatisticsSpeech recognitionTelecommunicationsMathematical analysisQuantization (signal processing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter addresses some of the effects that data collection methods have on the image. It presents signal sampling and the Nyquist sampling criterion. The discretization of infinite data is shown to lead to the Nyquist sampling rule for minimizing certain aliasing image errors (reconstruction artifacts). The chapter then discusses the truncation of the data, along with the truncated and discretized reconstructed image. It also describes the conditions under which the sampled signal and the sampled image are connected by the discrete version of the Fourier transform. The relationship of aliasing to rf coil properties, noise, and analog filters is also considered. Finally the chapter covers several consequences of inadequate or incorrect sampling, especially with respect to nonuniformities in κ-space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMagnetic Resonance ImagingSame topicNuclear Physics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207