Activation of Rho signaling contributes to lysophosphatidic acid-induced contraction of intact ileal smooth muscle of guinea-pig
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To elucidate the possible role of Rho A/Rho-kinase on lysophosphatidic acid (LPA)-induced contraction in intact guinea-pig ileal smooth muscle, we examined effects of pretreatment with a specific inhibitor of Rho-kinase (Y-27632) on the LPA-induced contraction and MLC 20 phosphorylation. In addition, we investigated whether LPA actually elicits an activation of Rho A by studying subcellular distribution of Rho A in unstimulated and stimulated smooth muscles by LPA. LPA induced a less intense, but sustained, contraction compared with ACh, and was accompanied by significant increases in MLC 20 phosphorylation. The effects of LPA on tension and MLC 20 phosphorylation were inhibited by Y-27632. The ACh-induced contraction, but not increases in MLC 20 phosphorylation, was partially inhibited by Y-27632. High K + -induced contraction was unaffected by the inhibitor. LPA stimulated translocation of Rho A from the cytosol to the membrane fraction of the muscle. Translocation of Rho A was also induced by ACh and high K + . These results suggest that LPA-induced contraction of intact ileal smooth muscle is dominated through activation of Rho A and Rho-kinase and subsequent increases in MLC 20 phosphorylation.Key words: lysophosphatidic acid, Rho, Rho-kinase, ileal smooth muscle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".