Sécurité nationale et sécurité globale: l'adaptation des services de renseignements français
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis les attentats américains de 2001, tous les services de renseignement ont été invités à se réorganiser, constat ayant été dressé de leur mauvaise réactivité à l'égard des nouvelles menaces. En France, deux phénomènes se jouent simultanément: les services de renseignement des ministères de la Défense et de l'Intérieur sont invités à coopérer plus efficacement tout en restant secrets. Une grammaire novatrice dite de la << sécurité globale >>, issue des cercles préfectoraux, semble accompagner cette intention. L'article en interroge les prémisses à l'aide de documents restés confidentiels. Faute d'interroger les pratiques réelles, la présente réflexion esquisse la nature des changements souhaités dans les bureaucraties régaliennes de l'État, dont le contrôle citoyen doit rester soigneusement dépossédé.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".