Interference from alkenes in chemiluminescent NO <sub> <i>x</i> </sub> measurements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Nitrogen oxides (NOx = NO + NO2) are critical intermediates in atmospheric chemistry. NOx levels control the cycling and hence abundance of the primary atmospheric oxidants OH and NO3, and regulate the ozone production which results from the degradation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the presence of sunlight. They are also atmospheric pollutants, and NO2 is commonly included in air quality objectives and regulations. NOx levels also affect the production of the nitrate component of secondary aerosol particles and other pollutants such as the lachrymator peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN). The accurate measurement of NO and NO2 is therefore crucial to air quality monitoring and understanding atmospheric composition. The most commonly used approach for measurement of NO is chemiluminescent detection of electronically excited NO2 (NO2*) from the NO + O3 reaction. Alkenes, ubiquitous in the atmosphere from biogenic and anthropogenic sources, also react with ozone to produce chemiluminescence and thus may contribute to the measured NOx signal. Their ozonolysis reaction may also be sufficiently rapid that their abundance in the instrument background cycle, which also utilises reaction with ozone, differs from the measurement cycle – such that the background subtraction is incomplete, and an interference effect results. This interference has been noted previously, and indeed the effect has been used to measure both alkenes and ozone in the atmosphere. Here we report the results of a systematic investigation of the response of a selection of commercial NOx monitors, ranging from systems used for routine air quality monitoring to atmospheric research instrumentation, to a series of alkenes. Alkenes investigated range from short chain alkenes, such as ethene, to the biogenic monoterpenes. Experiments were performed in the European Photoreactor (EUPHORE) to ensure common calibration and samples for the monitors, and to unequivocally confirm the alkene levels present (via FTIR). The instrument interference responses ranged from negligible levels up to 11 % depending upon the alkene present and conditions used (e.g. presence of co-reactants and differing humidity). Such interferences may be of substantial importance for the interpretation of ambient NOx data, particularly for high-VOC, low-NOx environments such as forests, or indoor environments where alkene abundance from personal care and cleaning products may be significant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".