MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

2019 4th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Signal Processing (ICSP 2019)

2019· article· en· W4233036817 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Data Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSignal processingField (mathematics)Computer scienceSIGNAL (programming language)Service (business)Library scienceTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preface This issue of Proceedings gathers the papers presented at 2019 4th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Signal Processing (ICSP 2019) held in Xi’an, China during March 29-31, 2019. ICSP 2019 is an international conference covering research and development in the field of intelligent computing and signal processing and participation from all over the world. More than 400 papers were finally accepted after a double blinded peer review process by international reviewers and academic committee members. Divided into 4 chapters, the papers provide a wide spectrum of researches on wide range of intelligent computing and signal processing. The chapters are devoted to Algorithm and Data Mining, Signal and Image Processing, Automation Engineering and Intelligent Application, Computer Modeling and Performance Structure. Specific research results by conference participants were presented and examined in the light of the frameworks outlined above, which is of interest to academics, researchers and professionals in this field. Two keynote speeches were presented from Prof. Weihua Zhuang, University of Waterloo, Canada, whose topic was about Service Provisioning in 5G Communication Networks; Prof. Nagula Sangary, University of Waterloo & Prudential Technology Ltd., whose topic was about Trends and Challenges in Terrestrial Satellite Wireless Communication Systems in mm-Wave range. All the talks were very impressive for the high level of professionalism, and in many cases original ideas and activities have been accomplished or proposed. List of Committees are availble in this PDF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score0.733

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2190.178

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicAdvanced Data Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207