A Very Low-phase-noise CMOS Ring VCO Intended for Sensor Interfaces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>We describe in the paper a ring voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) indicating an improved phase noise over a wide range of frequency offsets and an extended frequency/voltage tuning range. The phase noise is improved by leveraging a better linearity approach, while reducing the VCO gain and maintaining wide tuning range. The proposed VCO is a block of a time-domain comparator embedded in a monitoring and readout circuit of an industrial sensor interface. An analytical model is extracted resulting in closed-form expressions for both input-referred noise and phase noise of the VCO. Employing the analytical expressions, the contributed noise and phase noise limitations are fully addressed, and all the effective factors are investigated. The prototype of the proposed VCO was implemented and fabricated in a 0.35 µm CMOS process. The integrated VCO consumes 0.903 mW from a 3.3 V supply, when running at its maximum frequency of 9.37 MHz. The measured phase noise of the proposed VCO is -147.57 dBc/Hz at 1 MHz offset from the 9.37 MHz oscillation frequency, and the occupied silicon area of circuit is 0.005 mm<sup>2</sup>.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".