Experimental Investigations of the Effect of Scheme Exit Height and Double Row Injection on the Film Cooling Performance of a Micro Tangential Jet Scheme: Part I — Pressure Side
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents experimental investigations of the effect of scheme exit height and double jet injection on the film cooling performance of a Micro-Tangential-Jet (MTJ) scheme. The investigations were conducted over a gas turbine vane pressure side using the transient Thermochromic Liquid Crystal technique. The suction side investigations are presented in Part II of the present paper. The MTJ scheme is a micro-shaped scheme designed so that the micro-sized secondary jet is supplied tangentially to the vane surface. The scheme combines the benefits of micro jets and tangential injection. In order to investigate the effect of scheme exit height, one row of the MTJ scheme with 1.0 hole diameter exit height and another row with 1.5 hole diameter exit height were investigated. Meanwhile, to investigate the effect of double injection, one row of the MTJ scheme in staggered arrangement with one row of fan-shaped scheme was investigated. The investigations were conducted at various blowing ratios, calculated based on the scheme exit area. The average density ratio, turbulence intensity and Reynolds number were 0.93, 8.5, and 1.4E+5, respectively. The investigations showed that the smaller the exit height, the better the film cooling performance. Meanwhile, double injecting the secondary stream from MTJ and shaped schemes did not result in significant film cooling enhancement due to the enhanced turbulence over the vane surface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".