Méfiance entre les alliés.Les relations Napoléon-Godoy ( 1801 -1807)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au moment d'analyser sa trajectoire politique, Napoléon résumait ses relations avec Godoy en affirmant qu'ils avaient toujours essayé de se tromper mutuellement. Il parlait rarement de Godoy sur un ton favorable, exprimant toujours son mépris envers lui. Godoy, pourtant, ne méprisa jamais Napoléon et eut à son égard un sentiment mêlé d'admiration et de crainte. Selon l'empereur, en gouvernant aveuglément comme un véritable roi, Godoy obtint le mépris des Espagnols et la ruine de la nation ; c'est par ce constat qu'il justifiait la destitution des Bourbons d'Espagne. L'analyse des relations mutuelles montre que ce qui poussa directement l'empereur à changer la dynastie espagnole fut la crise interne que connut la cour de Madrid par suite des intrigues de l'héritier de la couronne, le prince Fernando, que l'empereur sut encourager et dont il parvint à tirer le meilleur profit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".