MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233138369 · doi:10.17683/ijomam/issue2.2

IMPACT OF THE IMPERFECT POLARIZING-BEAM SPLITTER AND QUARTER-WAVE PLATE AND NON-IDEAL LASER BEAM ON THE ACCURACY OF NANO-DISPLACEMENT LASER ENCODER

2017· article· en· W4233138369 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Saeed Olyaee, Abdollah Gorgani Firoozjah

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mechatronics and Applied Mechanics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Material Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsBeam splitterLaserLaser beamsDisplacement (psychology)Beam (structure)Laser beam qualityImperfectIdeal (ethics)Quarter (Canadian coin)Materials sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, periodic nonlinear error of laser encoder for nano-displacement measurement caused by imperfection of polarizing-beam splitter (PBS), quarter-wave plate (QWP), and laser source is modeled by using the Jones matrix analysis. The results reveal that the peak-topeak nonlinearity resulting from imperfect PBS and QWP, and non-orthogonality and ellipticity of the polarized laser beams is obtained as 14.82 nm. Also, considering typical values of transmittance and reflectance coefficients of PBS and different retardation errors of QWP, the first-order and second-order nonlinearities are respectively revealed resulting from imperfect PBS and QWP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Mechatronics and Applied MechanicsSame topicLaser Material Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207