MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233144852 · doi:10.18178/wcse.2016.06.031

Temperature and Humidity Management of the Storage Houses of Food Using Data Logger

2016· article· en· W4233144852 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of 2016 the 6th International Workshop on Computer Science and Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEnergy and Environmental Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData loggerHumidityStorage managementEnvironmental scienceRelative humidityComputer scienceDatabaseMeteorologyOperating systemGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Because of commercial fraud, and high and low temperature and humidity in the environment that lead to food spoilage and this may affect the health of the consumer. People need an effective way to maintain the safety of food products and consumer health. To control this problem, this paper proposed a solution using the data logger by connecting it to a computer. Data logger is a device that records the temperature and humidity of food products at regular times (depending on the minutes, hours, date), it displays them as fees graphic schemes, therefore, and it becomes easy to read. The results of these papers showed that for each environment different temperature and humidity. The data logger has proved its effectiveness in accurately recording the readings to prove the safety of the product by taking readings regularly, and this helps in controlling the problem of damage of products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.383
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it