MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233153656 · doi:10.1093/yiel/yvv050

9. Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC)

2014· article· en· W4233153656 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hugh Benevides, Paolo Solano

Bibliographic record

VenueYearbook of International Environmental Law · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicInternational Maritime Law Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommissionAdvisory committeeScope (computer science)Work (physics)Public administrationPolitical scienceMember statesEnvironmental protectionBusinessGeographyInternational tradeEngineeringLawEuropean union

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CEC was created in 1994 by the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC), concluded by Canada, Mexico, and the United States as a side agreement to the North American Free Trade Agreement. The CEC’s mission is to facilitate collaboration and public participation to foster conservation, protection, and enhancement of the North American environment. A council composed of ministerial-level environmental officials from each of the NAAEC parties governs the CEC, approving the overall program and budget and overseeing the CEC Secretariat and the implementation of the NAAEC. A fifteen-member Joint Public Advisory Committee (JPAC) acts as an advisory body to the council on any matter within the scope of the agreement. The CEC Secretariat is headquartered in Montreal and has a liaison office in Mexico City. It is headed by an executive director who oversees a cooperative work program on various North American environmental matters, the development of independent Secretariat reports on North American environmental issues, and the processing of citizens’ public submissions on enforcement matters (SEM) (more information at ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0190.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYearbook of International Environmental LawSame topicInternational Maritime Law IssuesFrench-language works237,207