MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233155860 · doi:10.1190/tle23080746.1

Mutating SEG

2004· article· vi· W4233155860 on OpenAlexaff
Mike Burianyk, Michael E. Enachescu, Mary LEE, Evgeny Landa, Sergio Chávez-pérez, Javier Díaz

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Leading Edge · 2004
Typearticle
Languagevi
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation in Diverse Contexts
Canadian institutionsShell (Canada)Global Affairs Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNiceComputer scienceSection (typography)Operations researchEngineeringOperating systemProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Just around the time of the New Year, we were involved with getting the University of Kyiv SEG student section a computer system from the SEG/GAC “PCs for Students Program.” We were quite happy about the progress. We had an excellent quote on a nice system, at a nice price, from a reputable computer supplier in Kyiv (MicroKvazar, for those of you shopping for a computer system in Kyiv). All we had to do was simply transfer the money to MicroKvazar's account and the deal was done! Well, not quite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Leading EdgeSame topicEducation in Diverse ContextsFrench-language works237,207