Adaptive 2D To 3D Image Conversion Using A Hybrid Graph Cuts And Random Walks Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis proposes an adaptive method for 2D to 3D conversion of images using a user-aided process based on Graph Cuts and Random Walks. Given user-defined labelling that correspond to a rough estimate of depth, the system produces a depth map which, combined with a 2D image can be used to synthesize a stereoscopic image pair. The work presented here is an extension of work done previously combining the popular Graph Cuts and Random Walks image segmentation algorithms. Specifically, the previous approach has been made adaptive by removing empirically determined constants; as well the quality of the results has been improved. This is achieved by feeding information from the Graph Cuts result into the Random Walks process in two different ways, and using edge and spatial information to adapt various weights. This thesis also presents a practical application which allows for a user to go through the entire process of 2D to 3D conversion using the method proposed in this work. The application is written using MATLAB, and allows a user to generate and edit depth maps intuitively and also allows a user to synthesize additional views of the image for display on 3D capable devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it