Bibliographic record
Abstract
With increasing re-recognition in recent years, education in China has drawn more and more global attention.China Watch is a signature column of Beijing International Review of Education, aiming at updating international communities with the latest policy move and practice improvement of education in China, featured with short articles around 2,500 words each.Topics of China Watch include but are not limited to learning, teaching or schooling; governance, leadership or planning in education; evaluation or assessment; teacher education; moral or citizenship education; language education; stem education; inclusive education; girls (women) education; vocational education; educational finance; privatization; or internationalization of education, etc., ranging from early childhood, basic to post-secondary education, from life-long to life-wide education, and/or from educational theory to practical innovation.China Watch in this issue focuses on recent curriculum reform in China, one on science in elementary schools and another on new curricular standards in senior higher schools.Articles in this signature column usually include three core components: (1) abstract; (2) an introduction about an enduring or emergent policy or practice of education in China, and; (3) a disciplinary or interdisciplinary analysis about it.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.065 | 0.048 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".