Cecilia Morgan on Gender Conflicts: New Essays in Women’s History
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the most striking developments in Canadian history over the past twenty years has been the growth of material focused on the position and experience of women in the Canadian past. Sexuality and reproduction, marriage and the family, work, education, political participation, voluntary activism, and religion are but a few of the most significant areas that have been explored and analysed by Canadian women’s historians (as well as those who work in related fields such as sociology). And in this process of historical retrieval and revision, Canadian historians have been informed that a whole raft of significant social and economic developments (major demographic shifts, urbanization and industrialization, the spread of state-supported education, the growth of various social and political movements, and Canadian participation in World Wars I and especially II) have not only included women but often have affected them in different ways and have had different meanings for them than for their male counterparts. Furthermore, Canadian historians have been informed that women’s presence and agency have been important influences on many historical processes and events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it