Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessJournal of Urology1 Feb 2002Editorial comment Michael A.S. Jewett Michael A.S. JewettMichael A.S. Jewett More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(02)80300-7AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Editorial comment." The Journal of Urology, 167(2 Part 2), p. 927 References 1. : The results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol1969; 101: 297. Link, Google Scholar 2. : Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy: the anterior approach including bilateral suprarenal hilar dissection. Urol Clin North Am1977; 4: 509. Google Scholar 3. : Distribution of lymph node metastases in testicular germinal tumors. Cancer1974; 33: 340. Google Scholar 4. : The distribution of nodal metastases in the retroperitoneum from nonseminomatous testis cancer. J Urol1982; 128: 315. Link, Google Scholar 5. : Localization of solitary and multiple metastases in stage II nonseminomatous testis tumor as basis for a modified staging lymph node dissection in sta. J Urol1987; 138: 77. Link, Google Scholar 6. : Immediate adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation with treatment at relapse in pathological stage II testicular cancer. N Engl J Med1987; 317: 1433. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar © 2002 by American Urological Association, IncFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 167Issue 2 Part 2February 2002Page: 927 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2002 by American Urological Association, IncMetricsAuthor Information Michael A.S. Jewett More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.044 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.013 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.448 | 0.281 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".