MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233283601 · doi:10.22215/etd/2015-10761

Behaviour of sensitive Leda clay under simple shear loading

2015· dissertation· en· W4233283601 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thayaparan Theenathayarl

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShear modulusMonotonic functionMaterials scienceLiquefactionSimple shearGeotechnical engineeringShear (geology)Damping ratioModulusComposite materialGeologyMathematicsPhysicsAcousticsVibrationMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An experimental investigation was conducted on undisturbed sensitive Leda clay samples from the Ottawa area using a simple shear device.Both small strain and large strain tests were conducted under a range of consolidation stress levels.The Carleton University simple shear device was improved to measure shear properties at small strain amplitudes.A successful research thesis is not possible without proper guidance and assistance.Hence, I gratefully thank my thesis supervisor Prof. Siva Sivathayalan for his continuous encouragement, patience and support during all the stages of this thesis and my Masters programme which gave me a lot of comfort to carry out various tasks successfully.An experimental program requires significant technical support.I greatly acknowledge the technical

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil MechanicsFrench-language works237,207