MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233354629 · doi:10.1080/10473220121164

Risk of Occupational Exposure to<i>Cryptosporidium, Giardia,</i>and<i>Campylobacter</i>Associated with the Feces of Giant Canada Geese

2001· article· en· W4233354629 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicParasitic Infections and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOhio Department of Health
KeywordsCryptosporidiumFecesGiardiaCampylobacterBiologyVeterinary medicineBrantaNuisanceMicrobiologyEcologyGooseMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Giant Canada geese (Branta canadensis maxima), which are nesting locally in Northwest Ohio and other parts of the state, are commonly perceived as a public nuisance when they inhabit urban areas. The feces of giant Canada geese litter both grass and pavement in many occupational and recreational sites in the Toledo area. The purpose of this study was to identify sites with fecal droppings of giant Canada geese that test positive for Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and Campylobacter, qualitatively assess the occupational risks of infections, and recommend protective measures. The fecal droppings of giant Canada geese were tested for Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and Campylobacter, using sensitive monoclonal enzyme immunoassay (EIA) methods. Fourteen out of 16 sites tested positive for at least one pathogen. None tested positive for all three. Cryptosporidium was the most common infectious organism found in the fecal droppings. It was detected in 14 out of 18 (77.8%) samples. Campylobacter was found in 7 out of 18 (38.9%) samples, and 3 out of 18 (16.7%) samples tested positive for Giardia. Since fecal droppings of giant Canada geese are dense in many sites, occupational exposure to Cryptosporidium is very plausible. In addition, fecal droppings from other carrier vertebrates are likely to be present in the same sites occupied by giant Canada geese, thereby increasing the likelihood of occupational exposure to one or more of these pathogens. It has also been suggested that houseflies and dung beetles may be mechanical carriers of Cryptosporidium. We recommend that work environments in close proximity to the nesting sites of giant Canada geese be maintained in a sanitary condition. Workers at risk for exposure should wear protective gloves while working, wash their hands after performing applicable activities and before touching their mouths, launder work clothes daily, and, ideally, shower at the end of the workday. We further recommend that potentially exposed workers who develop gastrointestinal infections have their stools tested for Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and Campylobacter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it