MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233402509 · doi:10.31009/iuslabor.2019.i01.02

Outsourcing and supply chains - Conclusions

2019· article· en· W4233402509 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Several Authors

Bibliographic record

VenueIUSLabor Revista d anàlisi de Dret del Treball · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicOutsourcing and Supply Chain Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutsourcingSupply chainBusinessIndustrial organizationCommerceProcess managementMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Comparative Labor Dossier (CLLD) in this issue 1/2019 of IUSLabor is dedicated to outsourcing and supply chains. Aside from Spain, renowned academics and professionals from the following countries have participated in this publication: France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, United Kingdom, Brazil, Costa Rica, Panam, Peru, Uruguay, Canada, China and India. The following pages contain the 10 main conclusions reached in the comparative study. Nevertheless, it is highly recommended the detailed reading of the pertinent chapters to better understand the conclusions here indicated. Likewise, you will find attached to the conclusions a summary table with the answers of the different legal regimes to each one of the questions on outsourcing and supply chains analyzed in this issue of IUSLabor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIUSLabor Revista d anàlisi de Dret del TreballSame topicOutsourcing and Supply Chain ManagementFrench-language works237,207