MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233411709 · doi:10.1673/031.004.2801

Eighth International Conference on the Juvenile Hormones

2004· article· en· W4233411709 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Insect Science · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHuman Health and Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyJuvenileJuvenile hormoneHormoneZoologyEcologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The biosynthesis of juvenile hormone (JH) by the corpora allata (CA) can be either stimulated or inhibited by neuropeptides termed allatotropin (AT) or allatostatin (AS), respectively.To date, only one AT has been identified.It was first isolated from heads of pharate adults of Manduca sexta (Manse-AT; GFKNVEMMTARGF-NH2).The gene encoding Manse-AT has been cloned from various lepidopterans, including S. frugiperda.Here we report the identification of a second peptide with allatotropic activity from the brain of S. frugiperda by molecular techniques.A cDNA that encodes 53 amino acids included one copy of the RVRG NPISCF-OH peptide.This peptide strongly stimulated the synthesis and release of JH in vitro by the CA of female adult S. frugiperda and was code-named Spofr-AT 2. The stimulation was dose-dependent with an app.EC 50 of ca. 10 -7 M. CA that were activated with Spofr-AT 2 could be inhibited by the addition of Manse-AS to the incubation medium.Northern blotting and RT-PCR analyses revealed that the preprohormone is expressed in the brain, midgut, and ovary in a developmental-specific manner.Whole-mount in situ hybridisation confirmed the gene expression in various tissues of adult females.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0810.054

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Insect ScienceSame topicHuman Health and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207