MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233424164 · doi:10.1515/9783598441349.532

SCHOOL LIBRARIES

2009· book-chapter· en· W4233424164 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Administration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary sciencePolitical scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

School libraries in Canada and the United States have a very short history compared to other types of libraries in North America; however, their histories have many similarities and some differences.While school libraries in both countries developed within their educational systems, Canada launched a more nationalized approach for its provinces, and the U.S. systems grew state by state. IN THE BEGINNINGCanadian education was modeled first after the French and then Great Britain, controlled by the church.Later the Ontario province passed legislation creating a school system with municipally elected boards, local taxation, and a central administration of education which was copied by the Constitution of 1867 giving control of education to the provinces.Designed by a Methodist minister, Egerton Ryerson, they copied the schools of the New England colonies.School libraries were often referred to as important in achieving the goals of education.(1) In the U.S., all government not covered by the Constitution is assigned to the individual states making education a part of state governance.The first schools in the United States were very small and in the hands of the headmaster.Students (usually male students) were asked to copy information from the board to their slates.They might learn how to read and write, but this came independently from what they were copying.Schooling was labor-intensive and available only to those who could pay.As the country grew, those in charge wanted a citizenry able to read and write, live and vote in a democratic society.In some of the larger cities, societies were formed to provide free education to the masses so they would become responsible citizens.These nineteenth-century societies adopted a method in which many students were organized into groups based on ability.The older students learned from the master, and then taught the younger ones.They copied and were drilled on facts until they knew them.(2) Slowly, but steadily, state governments across the nation built public schools, teachers were hired to educate all children, and school attendance became compulsory.Educational funding in the U.S. is left to state laws, and this varies by an individual state's ability and willingness to support education.Problems in equity arise.A current situation has to do with being able to find qualified teachers.In 1996, the National Commission on Teaching and America's future stated:Although no state will allow a person to fix plumbing, guard swimming pools, style hair, write wills, design a building, or practice medicine without

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1320.078

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLibrary Science and AdministrationFrench-language works237,207