MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233435239 · doi:10.1029/2009eo010010

Micrometeorology

2009· article· en· W4233435239 on OpenAlexaff
Roland B. Stull

Bibliographic record

VenueEos · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtmospheric sciencesEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyBoundary layerEvaporationPlanetary boundary layerMiddle latitudesDragGeologyGeographyTurbulencePhysicsMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Warm, gusty afternoons and cool, calm mornings during fair weather over many midlatitude land surfaces create a daily cycle that is comfortably familiar. But we forget that such meteorological variations are not observed above about 2 kilometers from the Earth's surface. Below that altitude, the air feels the direct influence of the Earth's surface; and daily changes of temperature, wind, and other variables are driven by solar heating, infrared cooling, evaporation, carbon dioxide exchange, and frictional drag. This layer of air influenced by the ground is called the atmospheric boundary layer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEosSame topicGeophysics and Gravity MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207