Fully parallel RRAM synaptic array for implementing binary neural network with (+1, −1) weights and (+1, 0) neurons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Binary Neural Networks (BNNs) have been recently proposed to improve the area-/energy-efficiency of the machine/deep learning hardware accelerators, which opens an opportunity to use the technologically more mature binary RRAM devices to effectively implement the binary synaptic weights. In addition, the binary neuron activation enables using the sense amplifier instead of the analog-to-digital converter to allow bitwise communication between layers of the neural networks. However, the sense amplifier has intrinsic offset that affects the threshold of binary neuron, thus it may degrade the classification accuracy. In this work, we analyze a fully parallel RRAM synaptic array architecture that implements the fully connected layers in a convolutional neural network with (+1, -1) weights and (+1, 0) neurons. The simulation results with TSMC 65 nm PDK show that the offset of current mode sense amplifier introduces a slight accuracy loss from ~98.5% to ~97.6% for MNIST dataset. Nevertheless, the proposed fully parallel BNN architecture (P-BNN) can achieve 137.35 TOPS/W energy efficiency for the inference, improved by ~20X compared to the sequential BNN architecture (S-BNN) with row-by-row read-out scheme. Moreover, the proposed P-BNN architecture can save the chip area by ~16% as it eliminates the area overhead of MAC peripheral units in the S-BNN architecture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".