MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4233479575 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10500063.1

A continuous thermal history for southern Baffin Island, Canada over the past 1.8 billion years: Implications for the assembly of Rodinia and the rifting of Greenland

2018· preprint· en· W4233479575 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Kalin T. McDannell, David Schneider, Lisel Currie, D R Issler, Peter K. Zeitler

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaGeological Survey of Canada
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsGeologyRodiniaOrogenySupercontinentZirconMonaziteGeochemistryThermochronologyLaurentiaBasementPaleozoicRiftFission track datingPaleontologySedimentary rockGeochronologyPrecambrianGondwanaArcheanCratonStructural basinTectonicsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New and recently published U-Pb, muscovite-biotite 40Ar/39Ar, K-feldspar MDD 40Ar/39Ar, zircon and apatite (U-Th)/He, and apatite fission-track data were compiled and inverted for a comprehensive, thermal history of southern Baffin Island, Canada. This work is a contribution to the Geo-mapping for Energy and Minerals (GEM) Baffin Island initiative and Trans-GEM synthesis of the Phanerozoic exhumation history of the Canadian Shield. Southern Baffin Island is comprised of Archean plutonic basement metamorphosed during the Trans-Hudson Orogeny. Monazite U-Pb dating on the Hall Peninsula suggest peak metamorphic conditions were at ca. 1850-1820 Ma and remained at >550ºC ca. 100 My after the thermal peak [1], while 40Ar/39Ar hydrous mineral ages and modeling suggest temperatures remained at >420-450ºC ca. 150-200 My after peak conditions [2]. New apatite U-Pb age populations are in agreement and range from 1674 ± 35 Ma to 1796 ± 75 Ma (2σ), suggesting elevated post-THO temperatures at ~450ºC. During the Meso- to Neoproterozoic the Hall Peninsula region experienced prolonged slow cooling on the order of ≤0.5ºC/My until ca. 1000 Ma when cooling accelerated to ~1ºC/My due to supercontinent Rodinia assembly. Sedimentary sequences place minimum timing constraints on basement rocks being at near-surface conditions in the early Paleozoic. Preliminary results from apatite fission-track data suggest that southwest Baffin (Meta-Incognita and Hall Peninsula) was fully exhumed by Paleozoic time during basement uplift that likely exploited preexisting, regional structures. Nearby Foxe Basin sediments suggest this region of the Canadian Shield was exhumed by the Late Ordovician (ca. 450 Ma) and either remained topographically high, or experienced minor burial during subsequent continental-wide transgression and shallow marine carbonate deposition in the Silurian-Devonian. AFT data from a >1890 Ma volcanic tuff cutting the Paleoproterozoic Hoare Bay Group sediments on the easternmost Cumberland Peninsula record rapid cooling in the Jurassic. The cooling signal recorded along Cumberland Peninsula is likely due to early crustal thinning related to rifting of Greenland from mainland Canada during Pangaea breakup and aligns with a model of rift-flank uplift. AFT models are in agreement with ages of dike swarms in West Greenland given as evidence by [3] for the onset of rift extension. The summarized cooling history of southern Baffin Island suggests post-THO cooling rates of ~1-3ºC/My from ca. 1700-1500 Ma, followed by slow cooling and Mesoproterozoic cooling pulses at ca. 1300 Ma and ca. 1000-950 Ma, likely due to Rodinia assembly. Rocks have been at temperatures <100ºC since ca. 500 Ma. [1] Skipton et al., 2016, J. of Petrology, v.57(8); [2] Skipton et al., 2017, Lithos, v.284; [3] Larsen et al., 2009, J. Geol. Soc., v.166.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→